AudioREVIEW's Forum Archives - Amplifier-Preamplifier


Archive Home >> Amplifier-Preamplifier(1 2 3 4 5 ) >> McIntosh MC162 vs. McCormack DNA125...which is better? Why?(2 posts)


McIntosh MC162 vs. McCormack DNA125...which is better? Why?Sam Pierce
Jul 12, 2001 10:34 AM
Just curious. I have narrowed down my selection to these 2, and am looking for warmth and detail in my music (listen to all types on a Magnepan MG12QR). I am looking forward to, and value, all comments and opinions. Thank you.
Hello Sam Pierce...Antonio Machado
Jul 12, 2001 4:36 PM
Hello there: You'll find an intersting review of the McCormack DNA-125 at one of the last issues of Stereophile magazine, I think near October 2000. I hope it helps. I am a lucky owner of the McCormack DNA-225 and I couldn't be happier. Good luck, let us know your decision and experiences. Best regards, Antonio Machado.
 


Archive Home >> Amplifier-Preamplifier(1 2 3 4 5 ) >> McIntosh MC162 vs. McCormack DNA125...which is better? Why?(2 posts)
 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a division of E-centives, Inc.