|   Speaker cable for Jmlabs?????? | Mizzuri
Apr 24, 2001 7:36 AM | | What sort/brand/type of cable is best for a pair of Jmlab Colbat 810 and Marantz SR8000????
Also biwiring???????
Im looking around the $25-30/m AUD(australian)
Any help is greatly appreciated
Thankyou |
| re: Speaker cable for Jmlabs?????? | Eyespy
Apr 24, 2001 8:09 AM | | "What sort/brand/type of cable is best for a pair of Jmlab Colbat 810 and Marantz SR8000????"
Any well made cable of sufficient gauge. 12 ga is so inexpensive, however, it is almost pointless to consider smaller wires even if they are acceptable.
"Also biwiring???????"
You are bi-wiring? It won't improve your sound, but no reason why you could not use the 12 ga to bi-wire.
"Im looking around the $25-30/m AUD(australian)"
I'm not familiar with the current exchange rates, , but if you would be willing to look around $0.29/foot, and if shipping to Australia is available, you can purchase 100 feet of Sound King 12ga speaker wire from partsexpress for $29 (plus S&H, not sure how much that would be to Australia, though, if they ship there)
"Any help is greatly appreciated"
"Thankyou"
My pleasure.
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&User_ID=1766728&St=2693&St2=82249712&St3=63185596&DS_ID=3&Product_ID=2792&DID=7
Perhaps there is a similar source for 12 ga wire in Australia? |
| re: Speaker cable for Jmlabs?????? | ChrisR
Apr 24, 2001 10:43 AM | | A neutral, proven cable like the Kimber 4TC would be your best bet. Experiment with a Z1 or Z2 Monster Cable could be done too. |
| re: Speaker cable for Jmlabs?????? | george2
Apr 24, 2001 12:18 PM | | The best is zip cord. You can get it at any good hardware store. Don't be suckered by the vast, wiring conspiracy. The truth is out there. g |
| GO TO RADIO SHACK NOW!!!! | AUDIOASYLUM.COM
Apr 24, 2001 3:02 PM | | LISTEN TO THESE GUYS WHO PROBABLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT LM LABS ARE...I DON'T THINK SO
DO YOUR SELF A FAVOR AND BUY QUALITY.
I THINK THAY ALL WORK AT RADIO SHACK...(HAHAHA) |
| GO TO RADIO SHACK NOW!!!! | AUDIOASYLUM.COM
Apr 24, 2001 3:03 PM | | LISTEN TO THESE GUYS WHO PROBABLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT LM LABS ARE...I DON'T THINK SO
DO YOUR SELF A FAVOR AND BUY QUALITY.
I THINK THEY ALL WORK AT RADIO SHACK...(HAHAHA) |
| THESE GUYS WHO PROBABLY DON'T KNOW WHAT LMLABS ARE | george2
Apr 24, 2001 3:31 PM | | Umm... JMLabs I've heard of. LMLabs... Hmmm Perhaps a new breed of labrador retriever? Don't be suckered by the vast, wiring conspiracy. The truth is out there. g |
| I had one of those | sometimesjones
Apr 26, 2001 1:15 PM | | He was great dog. |
| I had one of those | george2
Apr 26, 2001 1:58 PM | | I had one too. He was a smart dog. Much smarter than those suckers who cowtow to the spurious claims of the vast, wiring conspricy. g |
| GO TO RADIO SHACK NOW!!!! | estan
Apr 24, 2001 9:33 PM | | my names not dude!
it's JM Labs |
| well, aren't you the erudite one, you silver tounged devil, you. | observer
Apr 25, 2001 3:03 AM | | you really do come off looking intelligent here.
can you say "sarcasm", children?
have your mommy teach you what the caps lock key is. i'm assuming they are still trying to figure out who your daddy is. |
| YOU the erudite one! | hifitommy
Apr 25, 2001 9:39 PM | | ok, youre right about caps. AA-dont use alll caps, its considered yelling on the net.
AA, you low balled this one, i know its tiresome to keep hearing the mantra: all wire sounds alike----drooooooooooonnnnnnne. but YOU observer, thats about as ignorant a post as ive seen here. youre like a monkey that has been taught to throw excrement!
IF you could afford jm labs, or had more than a ht rcvr, youd start to realize that there are cabling diffs in sound.
just because emptycrafts and eye in the sky bark around like chihuahuas about there being no reason to go any further than ratshack or home depot (whichever is closer to save gas money), doesnt mean you should try to be like them.
well, you arent, they have better vocabularies than you.
well, yes, go to audioasylum.com and see what advice you get there. go to your local dealer and BORROW what you need to try, and dont expect to heart improvements or diffs in the first 20 seconds. it is entirely possible that a premium wire might sound not as good as a generic. thats when you borrow different ones.
anyone asking a q about the sound of one wire against another will get pretty much the same treatment by the receiver crowd that is in the majority here.
......regards.....tr |
| I'm with you hifi man...thanks.. | estan
Apr 25, 2001 10:00 PM | | I've been experimenting with cables for over 35 years and I am happy to report that in my systems there have been profound differences between cables...some for the better and some for the worse...perhaps I have been fortunate to have pretty high resolution gear to do my experiments with. However I don't think that the folks assembling budget systems should even think about the high end cables until they can put some synergy into their room - speaker interface and their front end source because these will be dollars better spent. |
| So that I better understand your claim... | Eyespy
Apr 25, 2001 10:05 PM | | "in my systems there have been profound differences between cables"
Would this include profound audible differences among like-gauged speaker wires? Same question for interconnects. |
| So that I better understand your claim... | estan
Apr 25, 2001 10:41 PM | | usually the experiments have been in architecture or construction technique. Gauge always is a need determined by power handling requirements between a particular amp and speaker...the list of variables here can be extensive as you probably already know. Usually if you take many different brands of same gauge speaker wire with similar architecture there would be no audible difference with a given amp and speaker combination being driven over the same length of cable.
The early experiments I did were for moving coil front ends and had more to do with shielding techniques from the tonearm to the stepup transformer..ie ...companies like Verion and MIT. In speaker cable companies like Randall Research were building similar cables to the home brew cat5 stuff that is such a rage today. These guys were aerospace engineers not cable marketers...I don't ever remember seeing an ad with ridiculus claims for their stuff...did it make a difference in my system..very much so..it provided the most ideal interface for my Krell KMA 100 watt monoblocs and my Apogee Divas. Did I spend months coming to this conclusion going back and forth with many different cables of different gauges and designs...you bet I did. Did I spend a lot of time and money?...Absolutely and I achieved the results that I wanted not caring one bit about what other peoples opinions were. Once in a while when I made an improvement I would have a few musicians and pro sound buddies over for refreshments and a listen and usually a lengthy discussion as to the differences we were hearing.
This is what this hifi hobby is about...don't you guys get it?
Anyway keep carrying on if you wish because it really makes no difference in the grander scheme of things.
The next best sounding technology to come along probably will eliminate cables altogether and then you will find something else to not see or hear a difference in. |
| So that I better understand your claim... | Eyespy
Apr 25, 2001 10:57 PM | | Http://www.bluetooth.com |
| So that I better understand your claim... | estan
Apr 25, 2001 11:20 PM | | yeah...you got the general idea...coming pretty soon to your neighborhood.
My son has done a lot of work on wireless development for one of the major news content providers.
here it goes...ready...?
programmable data streams delivered to wireless high bandwidth PDA's and an internal in home wireless network to deliver to the active sound transducer of your choice. Program your evenings entertainment and order your pizza while walking your dog in the park...what are we going to argue about? At&T has more jitter than Time Warner...can you substantiate that with a DBT? |
| Hey, don't rule it out | Eyespy
Apr 26, 2001 12:22 AM | | "what are we going to argue about? At&T has more jitter than Time Warner"
Some are very likely to make those very claims, or similar ones. There is always someone devising a solution in search of a problem. Especially in the world of alternative audio. |
| You, like others have chosen to experiment... | Resident Loser
Apr 26, 2001 8:00 AM | | ...you understand the rules of engagement and have committed to your goal. Your own post is, in itself, an answer of sorts.
Others post here, looking for the "magic bullet" and are ripe for the fleecing. They don't necessarily want to make ICs and speaker cables their life's work; instant gratification is the rule. I know it's not that simple and so do you...they don't.
Do you think the majority of listeners would be better off with the generic stuff and look to improve their hardware or their listening rooms or use their tone controls before embarking on the search for something that may not exist? I do.
jimHJJ(...I think that pretty much sums up part the "naysayers" basic position...it's a message that seems to get lost in all the hubub...) |
| I'm with you hifi man...thanks.. | mtrycrafts
Apr 25, 2001 11:47 PM | | Of course you can substantiate this testable claim? You did use DBT protocols at all times, right? Who else can verify your results? |
| What am I thinking | mtrycrafts
Apr 25, 2001 11:49 PM | | Of course you can substantiate your claims with credible evidence or else you would not have made them in th efirst place, right? |
| stan, I don't see what you are upset about. | observer
Apr 26, 2001 6:50 AM | | someone posts an extremely argumentative, insulting post and offers nothing of a positive nature. i responded in kind, albiet a bit better worded, and perhaps a little stronger. that's kind of one sided, isn't it?
the only thing in the original dimwit's post that made any possible sense was the suggestion to buy "quality" but was too vague to be construed as a positive contribution. what does dimwit mean by "quality"?
in my humble opinion, quality can be defined as solidly constructed wires made from good materials.
care to venture a guess on what "quality" stuff costs? do we always equate quality with expense? does one need spend a fortune to acquire solid construction? many here believe so. if it's not tommy hilfiger, it sucks.
many also claim miracles when changing cables. sorry, no... changes in sound will be subtle, if any.
many suggest their favorite brand without knowing anything else about the system or anything else for that matter. look at the ixoscable nitwit that runs around here and AA, also posting in all caps. Hmmmm.
like the dimwit that started this mess, what does he suggest? nothing, really. actually, thinking more about it, i'm not too sure it wasn't really hifitommy who likes to call names. why else would he get so riled up about my response? he's a blithereing idiot anyway.
as far as any sound differences in cables, this is extermely subjective and subject to many influences, not the least of which is one's ability to convince himself of miracles.
many here propose their favorite cables to everyone, regardless of the problems mentioned. brightness, lack of bass, too much bass, etc... again, look at the ixosidiot.
my belief? one should start with solidly constructed low priced stuff. Recoton, AR or the better RatShack stuff is fine. get used to it. then, try the better stuff with a money back guarantee but be aware of what your mind can do to you. Attitudes, beliefs and expectations can have a very powerful influence. many are surprised at how little difference there is, if any. and, many also begin to realize that they may be spending much money for a barely preceptable difference or even imagined difference. many also realize that those "new sounds they never heard before" weree actually present with their old cables when they switch back! They simply never listened that closely before.
one may not wish to pay for "quality" they do not need. but, then again. look at all the soccer mom's that drive around in big SUV's that never see rain, snow or off road conditions.
but then again, that;s status that has nothing to do with their need for the capabilities of the unit.
it's a pity that many (mostly newbies with entry level systems) are goaded into spending many dollars on cables in the misguided belief that they can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. those dollars can be better alotted elswhere in a low/mid system..
look at the poor guy that wants Tara cables to cure an obviously unrelated brightnes problem. there's alot of that here. looking at cables as a magic bullet. heck, I'd love to be able to take a pill to give me the body of a greek god but i know it takes excercise and a proper diet. there is no magic pill. likewise there is no magic cable. i'm actually surprised that no respondents met with any flak for once.
if you take issue with these, then perhaps then we can cross swords, but at this time i don't see a need to. my ire was as directed at a rude, insulting dimwit, not a belief. |
| stan, I don't see what you are upset about. | estan
Apr 26, 2001 9:03 AM | | me upset?...not at all.
As a matter of fact I am having a ball here...
My wife sometimes hovers over my shoulder and also gets a big kick out of what she refers to as "your hobby dear".
I only wish that some real knowledge could be openly shared where it would inspire experimentation instead of squashing creativity in the bud. It is not inspiring for a "newbie" to ask a question and be treated with some of the commentary that is slung around on this forum. Yes it is the responsibility of those with the acquired knowledge and experience to share that knowledge if they want to make a difference here. But it is not the responsibility of these individuals to require proof of claims that they don't agree with. They should either refute the claim based on their own experience or try to duplicate it themselves if they have any curiosity.
I myself have always lived on the cutting edge of technology and art. It is what I do both for a living and a lifestyle. I am not satisfied with the average or the mundane. I have been this way ever since I was a child and do to a severe case of arrested development I fear that I am stuck with it.
You are right...magic cables do not exist but in order to get this message across one must work with people to help them understand this. To say that cables don't make a difference is a worthless statement. To say that some brands are promoted on hype and marketing techniques is valuable information but to say there is no audible difference between these and other similar cables is not the responsibility of the people with the knowledge. It is solely the responsibility of the end user to make that determination.
I rarely hear anybody tell about their own system where they have experimented and not found differences. I don't know what mtrycrafts is listening to ...source, preamp, amp, speakers, speaker placement, acoustical qualities of his listening room, listening position, type of reference recordings etc...
Given this info I will be able to determine if I should pay any attention to him or not.
BTW...I am only using him as an example but that applies to all who post here.
Stan |
| welcome to the frey, my friend. | observer
Apr 26, 2001 9:31 AM | | as time goes on, you will find that the "naysayers" are fairly consistent as far as monikers and beliefs. you may not agree with them but at least you know who you are dealing with.
sorry to say, that cannot besaid of those who oppose them. please note how many threads are initiated by "unknown monikers" purely to ridicule those who are, let's say, more conservative in heaping praise on expensive products.
i am simply an occasional jab in their sides.
and, i believe the "naysayers" merely act as a foil to prevent those who don't really know what they are hearing from going off the deep end and throwing their hard earned money in the wrong places.
my definition of "better" is probably different than yours. let's not even tackle that overused phrase "what's the best...". it's amazing how many responses this gets. ...and they generally all differ!
also, i don't believe that "cables don't make a difference" is quite accurate. a more fitting stance might be that depending on many things) while they may make a slight difference, other remedies exist which generally are more effective and less costly, such as speaker placement, room treatment and the like are available.
starting out in this hobby with overly expensive cables is foolish. please see my previous post to you for more on that. expensive tires and racing stripes on a Yugo will not make it perform like a Lamborghini.
i'd say that most (not all) petitioners are generally in the entry level hi fi class where they should be less dependent on others recommendations and more on their own impressions but you know how peer pressure is.
in any case, welcome to the frey. a mature voice of experience is always welcome, but be prepared to be challanged on occasion. you seem to indicate that the quality of the basic system components and the room as having more an impact than cables. i don't think you will have much argument on that from most here.
and, if we are all lucky, i won't resurface too soon. a spate of childish remarks will wake me up, though. then i have my fun. |
| welcome to the frey, my friend..................... | estan
Apr 26, 2001 10:14 AM | | I would then miss you and have to wake you up myself..... |
| welcome to the frey, my friend.....................3 | estan
Apr 26, 2001 10:37 AM | | BTW ...I have slipped back in time a bit as I have gotten older and am now using vintage tube equipment and some highly customized speakers that started out as Spica TC 50's. Am now redesigning these as far as drivers go...we love the look of the boxes and they are very well constructed after all the mods done on them but the new driver technologies just can't be overlooked.
Also am using vintage cables and these are hardwired to the crossovers and the amps on the speaker side. Also have a custom subwoofer designed to work crossoverless with the Spicas. Sounds pretty good In my room although not nearly where it used to be with the Krells and the Apogees and a huge analog front end.
But alas my work took me around the globe and I got rid of everything for a few years including the record collection.
I do love the tube gear and the vintage stuff is really fun to work on.
Am now really trying to extract some acceptable sound from cd's and doing a pretty good job of it for not a lot of money.
Regards,
Stan |
| welcome to the frey, my friend.....................3 | Eyespy
Apr 26, 2001 10:07 PM | | Very interesting. Any pics? You could post in the photo gallery. BTW, did you notice that the AR pages are loading s l o w tonight? |
| welcome to the frey, my friend.....................3 | estan
Apr 26, 2001 10:14 PM | | yeah...speed is up and down but this morning and last night it was zippin right along.
Yeah I'll put some pics on the mac.com server and post the url in a few minutes.
Excuse the rats nest of cables but I was moving a lot of stuff around when I did the shots...I'll do some better ones soon |
| welcome to the frey, my friend.....................3 | Eyespy
Apr 26, 2001 10:24 PM | | Kind of late in NY, no? BTW, my HT/Audio webpage was recently taken down by homepage.com, but I saved the HTML, and I have the pics in jpegs. Maybe will find another free host. Actually, my cable provider is going to change ISPs to @home.com. Maybe I can set up a page there. |
| welcome to the frey, my friend..URL for pix | estan
Apr 26, 2001 11:10 PM | | Yeah..it's a bit late but I usually take a nap in the early evening and then I can work or do this stuff undisturbed.
Here is a link to a public folder where I have a few images sitting.
http://homepage.mac.com/estan
not much to go by but also there seem to be a few photos of some friends that you might enjoy. |
| i thank you kindly, sir. | observer
Apr 26, 2001 1:22 PM | | i'm sure we'll meet again.
if not in this incarnation then in another.
we are not always as we initially appear. |
| i thank you kindly, sir. | estan
Apr 26, 2001 1:26 PM | | truer words were never spoken...
c ya |
| i thank you kindly, sir. | TinHere
Apr 26, 2001 10:49 PM | | They're setting you up, while they get close enough to find vulnerability. I've seen it before. Of course you have a nice system, knowlege, and what seems to be a pleasing manner. Hmmmm, maybe your just setting them up. I don't know about cables, but the folks here are always looking for a new viewpoint that agrees with them. Sorry to jump in, it seems you want some alone time togather, be it here or there. |
| stan, I don't see what you are upset about. | mtrycrafts
Apr 26, 2001 5:59 PM | | >>>I don't know what mtrycrafts is listening to ...source, preamp, amp, speakers, speaker placement, acoustical qualities of his listening room, listening position, type of reference recordings etc... <<<<
Irrelevant, really. I may not even have a system. I make no claims for it, nor with it. You have not even offered credible evidence that any of this is relevant and it makes a hoot about the outcome in a DBT.
>>>Given this info I will be able to determine if I should pay any attention to him or not<<<
Please don't pay any attension to me. I don't really need it, unless you have real citations to real information.
Oh, yes, personal experiences can be based on flawed experimentations, hence unreliable. So, no, don't try to impress me with it. |
| stan, I don't see what you are upset about. | estan
Apr 26, 2001 10:52 PM | | I am not a scientist..I am an artist and therefore nothing done blindly is relevant to me. I believe in creating what works for me and not for anyone else. If what I create spurs the emotions of others then I have only given them a window to my heart and soul.
To keep it simple...if I create a piece of art and hang it on the wall because I love what I have done...and then go back the next day and look at it and still love it...and the day after..and the week after...and maybe years later I still love it...then it has become a part of me that is on display for all who pass by. If I come back after a day and I need to redo it or make changes or just throw it away then it is only within myself that the explanation might exist. People might say why did you remove it It was beautiful... and I have no answer for them except to say that it didn't work for me.
To me the perceived reliability of my art to reach out and touch the emotions of others cannot be tested. I will take all the tools available to me and use them in unconventional ways to create works that cannot and should not be duplicated by others. I consider myself fortunate...I live a beautiful and very fulfilling life and my personal experiences are all that I have to take with me. All else will eventually recycle and you might even get a piece of some of it someday. My opinions and they are only opinions have been very helpful to a lot of folks that have come to me for advice. I advise based on my interpretation of their personal needs to acheive satisfaction.
Consider the feelings of somebody who has taken the advice of the person who sent them to Radio Shack for cables to go in the system that they have decided will become a big part of their lifestyle. Every day they might be wondering if maybe it would have been a better choice to spend the money on cables that seem to be designed for the quality components that they have assembled. Maybe there is no difference in the sound and maybe there is...makes no difference...if it can't hang on the wall day in and day out without giving you the enjoyment you were looking for than it should not stay. |
| stan, I don't see what you are upset about. | Dupper
Apr 27, 2001 9:13 PM | | Why would anyone want to impress you with anything? You have a very big head. |
| tommy, you highly cioffed, illiterate, leg humping poodle... | observer
Apr 26, 2001 3:58 AM | | i don't hold his views against him. only his childish, mocking, attitide. "LMLABS"? give me a break. but, with your command of the "ameracan" language, it does not surprise me that you would jump to the defense of another "communication challanged" individual.
is he typical of those at AA?
are they proud to have one such as him flying their banner?
he makes it look as if they are a bunch of childish illiterates that can neither spell, compose a ssentence nor promote one logical thought in a post without trying to throw dirt.
altghough i know this is not the case, your defense of him causes me to assume you are no better than him.
no, child, views are opinions. they are allowed. they may be challanged but they are welcomed.
mocking is met with other mocking, much like your attitide. don't like mine, poodle? too effin bad. learn to deal with it. |
| tommy, you highly cioffed, illiterate, leg humping poodle... | hifitommy
Apr 26, 2001 6:20 AM | | emptycrafts with bad language skills! thats what you wannabe!
.......tr |
| arf arf, poodle boy. | observer
Apr 26, 2001 6:54 AM | | as usual, you make no sense. are you CE's alter ego or what?
now, get off my leg! |
| Omigosh! Do we now have two poodleboys roaming the countryside.. | Resident Loser
Apr 26, 2001 7:40 AM | | ...spreading their pestilence?
I suggest we take some of the silvery wires and cast them into bullets, the only way to rid Gods' green earth of them. We must! We shall not falter! We cannot allow them to procreate, for then all will be lost! Oh, lamentations!... what will become of us?
jimHJJ(...the poodle(s)bi-i-i-ite, the poodle(s)chew it...) |
| SIR! I beg to differ. | observer
Apr 26, 2001 8:31 AM | | if anything, please consider me one of the chihuahuas that so gets on his nerves. true, i'll bite your ankle but he's the one that will hump your leg. |
| No,no,no... | Resident Loser
Apr 26, 2001 10:40 AM | | ...I referred not to yourself as one of "THEM". A thousand pardons if I gave that impression.
There is another who walks, or rather lopes, the length and breadth of our fair land, yet I dare not speak its' vile name lest I unleash its' boundless stupidity upon the unsuspecting populace. It understands not the simplest of sentences and when faced with facts becomes particularly viscious(with all the spitting siblance of a mutant Sylvester the cat). Perhaps my previous encounters with it have escaped your keen observation; no matter, we shall speak of it no further. Tarry not in this place too long, my advice is to head yonder, for 'tis a wicked domain of sprites and faeries and things that go DUH! in the night...be ever on your guard!
jimHJJ(...till we meet again...) |
| No,no,no... | DulceBuzz
Apr 26, 2001 6:19 PM | | I see everyone is acting their age finally. |
| No,no,no... Look what you've done. What happened here?... | TinHere
Apr 26, 2001 10:55 PM | | You've only yourselves to blame. |
| Sorry for the breach because I respect | TinHere
Apr 26, 2001 11:15 PM | | things here in general. |
| Little levity | MajorDump
Apr 27, 2001 5:43 PM | | The difference between a Chihuahua humping your leg and a Pit Bull humping your leg is... the Pit Bull gets to finish. |
| Little levity | Rockwell
Apr 27, 2001 9:00 PM | | Indeed...LOL! |
| SIR! I beg to differ. | hifitommy
Apr 28, 2001 1:20 PM | | certainly a better fousrce of gratification ;^) |
| tommy, you highly cioffed, illiterate, leg humping poodle... | Dupper
Apr 26, 2001 6:16 PM | | I didn't know there was an "american" language. |
| Fer da' mos' part, it soitently ain't english...(nt) | Resident Loser
Apr 27, 2001 5:46 AM | | NT |
| re: Speaker cable for Jmlabs?????? | Greg W
Apr 27, 2001 6:37 AM | | I've owned 2 sets of JM Labs (first Opals, and now Electras), and I can tell you there is a HUGE difference in sound with these speakers using varying cables. I also used to own the SR8000, so I can give you a pretty good idea of my experience with almost the same equipment.
While the Cobalts are JM Labs mid-line speakers, they will put to shame anything in it's pricerange, and alot of more expensive speakers as well. I tried MIT Terminators (a little dull), DH Labs (boring), and Kimbers (definatly to bright. The Marantz is already on the bright side), and ended up going with JPS Labs Ultraconductors for the best sound match. I recently upgraded to seperates (see below), and went with the JPS Labs Superconductors for my Electra 905's. The thing about these speakers is that they will show you all the detail of whatever you put into them. If you mostly use them for HT, the Ultras would be a good match. If you listen to more than 25-30% 2 channel, you'll probably want to reconsider the reciever. I traded in my SR-8000 for an SR-18EX thinking it would do the job, but there really wasn't alot of difference. We're about 50-50 HT to 2 channel music, so seperates easily won out over that configuration. I don't know if there is a JPS Labs dealer in your area, but check out http://www.jpslabs.com .
My current system (for this week anyway :)
Pre/Pro - TagMcLaren-AV32R (Incredible)
CD Transport - TagMcLaren-CDT20R-T2L
Tuner - TagMcLaren-T20
Amp - Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature (405x5 - nuff said :)
DVD - Sony S-9000EX
Speakers - JM Labs 905's (x4)
Center - JM Labs CC30
Sub - JM Labs SW33A
Speaker Cables - JPS Labs Superconductors
Interconnects - Nordost BassLine Analog & Sub, Moonglow Digital |
| |
