|   pIONEER versus rADIO sHACK | mcurine
Oct 23, 2002 5:52 PM | | I would like a definitive answer regarding the difference between Pioneer A/V receivers and Radio Shack A/V receivers... it seems that both share the same chassis and faceplate but what else? |
| tHEY aLSO sHARE aN i,o, AND AN r! (nt) | karl k
Oct 23, 2002 6:36 PM | | |
| tHeYr'e PRob boTH.. | bo130
Oct 23, 2002 6:46 PM | | ..unREliAble pIeCes OF GaRBAge. i CaN'T SpeAK foR PIoneEr's 'ElIEt' SErieS, BUt dON't placE MUCh faITh iN ThEIr OtHER reCIEveRS.. |
| I was told | JDaniel
Oct 24, 2002 5:34 AM | | by a Rad. Shack manager that most of their RCA branded products are just an entry level Pioneer, repackaged. I was looking at their CD changers, which Pioneer has a good reputation for. The mgr. specifically mentioned receivers and cd players as made by Pioneer.
That's all I know.
JDaniel |
| re: pIONEER versus rADIO sHACK | Night Wolf
Oct 24, 2002 7:56 AM | | Pioneer makes RS's gear, my dad owns a Dolby digital (no dts) reciever, actualy nice, and good quality (has the speaker distance thing, not delays) but its the same thing as Pionner, at my dad's I have a RS pro logic system (use it in stereo, with crummy Jensen speakers and a crappy passive sub form RS, but i never listen to that much anyway) and its the same as Pioneer's |
| Unfortunate owners would top the list in my book | spacedeckman
Oct 25, 2002 7:52 PM | | Buy something good. Rake some leaves or shovel snow if you need more money. I've considered selling plasma for a new turntable at one point. |
| Unfortunate owners would top the list in my book | bogrod
Oct 26, 2002 8:10 PM | | Right on, Spacedeckman. I'd personally put my money into reliability as a first consideration, then go from there if I had extra cash. |
| |
